COLUMBUS, Ohio - Workers cannot sue their employer for invasion of privacy when they provide urine samples for drug testing under the “direct observation method,” the Ohio Supreme Court ruled in a split decision Wednesday.
The court’s 4-3 decision reversed an Ohio Fifth District Court of Appeals decision. The appellate court had determined the two former and two current Sterilite of Ohio employees had a valid claim for invasion of privacy based on them being observed urinating or attempting to urinate to produce samples, which was part of Sterilite’s mandatory substance-abuse testing procedures.
The company hired U.S. Healthworks Medical Group of Ohio to administer the workplace drug testing program. In October 2016, U.S. Healthworks began collecting urine samples under the direct-observation method, in which a same-sex monitor would accompany the Sterilite employee to the restroom to visually observe the employee produce a urine sample.
The majority of the court thought that under the circumstances, the drug testing didn’t constitute an invasion of privacy.
Once the employees proceeded with the observation drug test without objecting, they consented by producing or attempting to produce the urine, Justice Sharon Kennedy wrote for the majority opinion.
“When an at-will employee consents, without objection, to the collection of the employee’s urine sample under the direct-observation method, the at-will employee has no cause of action for common-law invasion of privacy,” she wrote.
Justices Judith French, Patrick Fischer and R. Patrick DeWine joined Kennedy’s opinion.
In a dissenting opinion, Justice Melody Stewart wrote that the employees were given the choice to submit to a highly offensive test or be terminated on the spot, which is no choice at all.
She wrote that the employees made the case that Sterilite coerced them to “submit to the humiliation of having their genitalia directly observed,” and they have a valid invasion of privacy claim.
Joining the dissent were Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor and Michael P. Donnelly.
More coverage:
Ohio coronavirus cases increase by 844: Tuesday update
U.S. Supreme Court bars Ohio AG from participating in oral arguments in Obamacare case
Presidential hopeful Kanye West fails to get on Ohio’s General Election ballot
"claim" - Google News
August 26, 2020 at 09:12PM
https://ift.tt/3jfD3Wt
Workers can’t claim invasion of privacy if employers have them watched during urine drug tests: Ohio Supreme - cleveland.com
"claim" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2FrzzOU
https://ift.tt/2VZxqTS
Bagikan Berita Ini
0 Response to "Workers can’t claim invasion of privacy if employers have them watched during urine drug tests: Ohio Supreme - cleveland.com"
Post a Comment