By BILL HETHERMAN | City News Service
LOS ANGELES — A probate court judge on Tuesday, Aug. 17, ordered a briefing from attorneys to determine the validity of a man’s claim to be the grandson of mass murderer Charles Manson.
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge C. Edward Simpson said no witnesses will be called to support or refute the kinship claim of Jason Freeman, one of three people who want to be the permanent administrator of the infamous cult leader’s estate. But Simpson scheduled a hearing for Jan. 18 so the judge in charge of the case at that time can decide whether more information is needed.
Freeman earlier this year won a victory in the 2nd District Court of Appeal when a three-justice panel ruled he does not have to undergo DNA testing to prove his claimed relationship to Manson. The justices found that Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Clifford Klein, who has since retired, erred when he signed an order in 2019 directing that the 45-year-old Freeman submit to DNA sampling.
Freeman had once told the judge that he would not voluntarily agree to DNA testing, but would obey a court order to do so. His appeal had put on hold a trial of whether he or longtime Manson pen pal Michael Channels should be the permanent administrator of Manson’s estate.
Channels had asked for the DNA test of Freeman. In his court papers, Channels said Manson’s 2002 will, filed in Kern County in November 2017, named him as the executor of Manson’s estate.
Freeman, acting as his own attorney, has filed court papers stating that probate of the will should be denied because it was created “as a direct result of undue influence exercised by (Channels) over (Manson) and is not, and never was, the will of (Manson).”
Manson suffered from heart disease and other ailments before he died in 2017, according to Freeman’s court papers.
“Because of his weakened condition, (Channels) … gained his confidence and easily influenced (Manson) to leave all of his estate to (Channels),” Freeman’s court papers state.
Timothy Lyons, a lawyer for Channels, told the judge Tuesday that a determination of the validity of the 2002 Manson will also is essential, but the judge said that should be done separately from the resolution of Freeman’s kinship claim.
A third bid to administer the Manson estate has come from Nancy Claassen of Spokane, Washington, who alleges in her court papers that she and Manson had the same mother and that she therefore is his “sole heir-at-law.”
Claassen disputes Freeman’s claim to be Manson’s grandson.
Alan Davis, an attorney for Dale Kiken, a lawyer and current temporary special administrator of the Manson estate, previously said Klein had jurisdiction to make orders regarding Freeman, a resident of Bradenton, Florida, because Freeman voluntarily made himself a part of the California-based Manson case.
Kiken has represented Freeman’s interests by, among other things, recovering property that Manson left behind in prison when he died at age 83 on Nov. 19, 2017, at Bakersfield Mercy Hospital of heart failure triggered by colon cancer. In March 2018, a Kern County commissioner ruled that Freeman was entitled to Manson’s remains and that order established that Freeman was Manson’s grandson, according to Davis.
In February 1986, an Ohio judge additionally found that Freeman was the son of Charles Manson Jr., also known as Charles White, who killed himself in June 1993, Davis added.
Manson and members of his outcast “family” of followers were convicted of killing actress Sharon Tate — who was eight months pregnant —and six other people during a bloody rampage in the Los Angeles area in August 1969.
Prosecutors said Manson and his followers were trying to incite a race war he dubbed “Helter Skelter,” taken from the Beatles song of the same name.
The Manson clan also stabbed to death grocery magnate Leno La Bianca and his wife Rosemary La Bianca the night after the Tate murders.
Manson was convicted of seven counts of first-degree murder and one count of conspiracy to commit murder in the deaths of Tate, the La Biancas, and four other people at the Tate residence — coffee heiress Abigail Ann Folger, photographer Wojciech Frykowski, hairdresser Jay Sebring and Steven Earl Parent, who was shot in his car on his way to visit an acquaintance who lived in a separate rented guest house on the Tate property.
Manson and followers Charles “Tex” Watson, Leslie Van Houten, Patricia Krenwinkel and the late Susan Atkins all were convicted and sentenced to state prisons in 1971. Manson also was convicted in December of that year of first-degree murder for the July 25, 1969, death of Gary Hinman and the August 1969 death of Donald Shea.
He and the others originally were sentenced to death, but a 1972 state Supreme Court decision caused all capital sentences in California to be commuted to life in prison. There was no life-without-parole sentence at the time.
Manson was denied parole a dozen times.
"claim" - Google News
August 18, 2021 at 06:43AM
https://ift.tt/3k5ducY
Judge will determine validity of man’s claim to be Charles Manson’s grandson - LA Daily News
"claim" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2FrzzOU
https://ift.tt/2VZxqTS
Bagikan Berita Ini
0 Response to "Judge will determine validity of man’s claim to be Charles Manson’s grandson - LA Daily News"
Post a Comment